Evaluation: 20 marks
Candidates should critically evaluate the process of producing their portfolio. The evaluation should be between 750 -1000 words.
Candidates must address the following questions in the evaluation:
Q1. What were the aims (purpose) of the script & 9 key frames? 500 words
Outline the purpose of the script which was to create a
disruption or resolution scene for sequel or prequel for [which one of
your films?] that explored [discuss your specific study proposal/thesis
statement] of [your MACRO] . The purpose of the 9 Key Frames was
to select key moments in the script that would be filmed to construct [your MACRO study] through [discuss your decisions regarding location, costume, props, character]
& camera angle/shot types
Q2. What codes and conventions (genre, character & narrative threads, how films use mise-en-scene, camera & sound to create meaning), identified in the textual analysis essay were used in the script & 9 key frames? 500 words
Analyse & make connections, what aspects of genre & narrative/character threads did you continue in you prequel/sequel?
Examine the links to your textual analysis MICRO points in your essay - reflect on how this influenced your decisions for your script scene & 9 key frames (Terminology: mise-en-scene, location, costume, props, actors, camera angles, composition, shot type] used meaning from your film analysis
Q3. How was the location report used in the construction of the 9 key frames? 500 words
Explain the connections, how scouting & reporting for locations was used to create the 9 key frames or revisions to the script, what influences did it have on your ideas for the script or vice versa?
Q4. How successful was the script & 9 key frames in achieving the aims (its purpose)? 500 words
Justify the strengths & weakness by being critical of your work, reflect on it's success as a sequel/prequel (look again at the as films we have seen) suggest improvements
