Monday, 2 February 2015
Monday, 26 January 2015
Essay Lego - Points (add explaination from exemplar essays) and your own examples
"Film censorship is motivated by fears about audiences and technologies" Discuss this statement in reference to the concerns expressed about uncensored and unregulated video content in Britain in the early 1980s.
Piracy - no check on certificate
Devalues technology and film
Developing technology allows people to pirate them and steal
Longer lasting videos- lower cinema attendance
Illegal but video certificates can not be checked when at home
Censorship- graphic violence, rape, pornographic sex scenes
Censored movies- can't see at the movies, made the popular to see what the fuss was about
Being told it's bad by Margaret thatcher, Conservative party
The human centipede 2- censored
People might act upon it
Clockwork orange- rape as violence, teenage character
Morally wrong
Government- censored films but they hadn't watched them
Upper class protecting working class
Nanny state- treated like children
Moral panic
Scapegoat
Remove phalic images
Nudity
"Lesbians and homos"
Teddy boys
Years later the wild one was allowed to be shown
1971- scandal movies
The director had death threats to his family so he withdrew clockwork orange from being shown in England
Video nasties horrific enough to seized by the police
Moral panic- introduce classification
News- links disasters to films
Technology; home video
Political; conservative government sought to protect by putting age regulations and restrictions
Mortality, video nasties- censorships
Social; riots against Margaret thatcher, so they waited for campaigns against video nasties to step in, Mary whitehouse
Media, scape goat, moral panic
Economic;cinema attendance declined, low budget made for a niche audience
Low budget- more realistic
Low budget- more realistic
Modern
day, horror films which were censored have now been remade as society
has been exposed and therefore are more lenient- Texas chainsaw
Influential to the film industry
Case studies;
Texas chainsaw
I spit on your grave
Evil dead
Driller killed
''Film censorship is motivated by fears about audiences and
technology'' Discuss this statement in reference to the concerns
expressed about uncensored and unregulated video content
The 4 contextual points that show these fears are economic, social, political and technological. Economically, the BBFC started to issue age classifications to objectionable content on home video releases, which meant that they could control the content people watched whilst also making money off people buying these home releases. Socially, film censorship was evident in the video nasties which were refused a classification by the BBFC so they could not be viewed in cinemas or legal home video. These video nasties attracted attention because more people wanted to see why they were banned and they turned into a social event for people. Politically, the conservative government feared that people watching objectionable content in horror films and video nasties would inspire copycat behaviour from society to re-enact these films, which would raise the crime rate of the country. Technologically, the format wars between VHS and Betamax were ongoing. VHS won the format wars between the two video tape players because VHS was easier for people to pirate films and video nasties onto thus showing why film censorship had a role to play in the format wars.
In the early 1980's people were less interested in going to the cinema and instead it was more popular for people to stay at home and watch films on VHS or Betamax. This turned into a social event, with people inviting their friends over to watch films at their homes. The emergence of film censorship and regulated video content meant that some films were deemed too horrific, obscene or violent to be shown to the public by the BBFC, under the conservative government. Films that were refused a rating, which meant they could not be publicly released were placed on the 'video nasties' list with films like 'Driller Killer' and 'Cannibal Holocaust'. However criminals simply copied bootleg copies of the films from other countries and distributed them illegally to people wanting to watch them. This boosted the social aspect of staying at home and watching a film with friends because these films has gained notoriety and interest from being banned which is the exact opposite effect that the government wanted these films to have. This social context justifies that film censorship is highly motivated by fears about audiences and technologies because the new technological advancement of video tape players and recorders changed the way how people watch films entirely and film censorship is how they tried to stop this change.
These video nasties and other banned films were the end product of the countries moral panic caused by the conservative government led by Margaret Thatcher. The conservative government believed that content in films reflected on society and that very violent and obscene horror films could inspire similar or copycat behaviours in young people. To fight this, the National viewers and listeners association formed to protest against objectionable films, they protested and applied pressure on the BBFC to ban or censor films. The BBFC eventually did listen and they formed the video nasties list, where certain films were banned outright. This is a political context which justifies how film censorship is heavily motivated by fears about audiences, the conservative government felt that by allowing public access to these films content, it would incite violence into people and desensitise people. They also feared that the crime rate would go up in the country so they could have used the video nasties as a scapegoat for the increase in crime or violence.
Expanding on the moral panic surrounding these films, the government and the video tape industry suffered from the moral panic economically ,the National Viewers and Listeners Association protested against violent films and wanted the government, specifically the BBFC to regulate video content on home video. Eventually the BBFC regulated the content via age restrictions that they were already using in cinemas but now they were also using these certificates in home video releases. This restricted children or young teenagers from buying horror film tapes. This limited the sales of their tapes and people chose to buy pirate copies from criminals who didn't care how old you were. This combined with the accessibility of piracy on VHS meant that the video tape industry lost money. This links back to a economical context, because their fear is justified here because they lost money due to film censorship in that it reduced their buyers market.
Finally, the BBFC acted as a censor and regulator for the film and decided to ban films that formed the video nasties list. It also regulated what age group could watch a film via its classification system. Specifically, it was illegal to distribute or sell a video nasty in a shop. They could only be pirated in order to see them. Social demand was for people to watch these video nasties to see why they were banned. It was considered fashionable or popular to watch them and own them. This links to a technological and economic context with the format wars between VHS and Betamax which VHS won. VHS was easier for criminals to copy films, which meant people needed to watch pirate films and video nasties on VHS's. VHS was more popular. This links to film censorship and fears surrounding it because essentially, film censorship was made to fight piracy.
In conclusion, I think that film censorship was highly motivated by fears about audiences and technology. The conservative government and National Viewers and Listeners Association were worried about a moral panic in England whilst cinemas and film distributors found it hard to sell their regulated content tapes whilst piracy grew in popularity. Ultimately, the attempt to stop people being exposed to obscene content failed because by making a list of films that no one should watch, they inevitably attracted attention for people who wanted to see them. Ironically, the video nasties were probably more popular than they would have ever been if they were not on the video nasties list. Also, directors of video nasties like Wes Craven and Sam Raimi went to direct mainstream horror films so being on the video nasties list helped their career. For cinemas and film distributors, there is little they can do to stop piracy, with film classification being necessary in terms of content. There is always going to be piracy. However, censoring and banning content is ineffective in the long term as the video nasties have shown.
''Film censorship is motivated by fears about audiences and technology'' Discuss this statement in reference to the concerns expressed about uncensored and unregulated video content
The 4 contextual points that show these fears are economic, social, political and technological. Economically, the BBFC started to issue age classifications to objectionable content on home video releases, which meant that they could control the content people watched whilst also making money off people buying these home releases. Socially, film censorship was evident in the video nasties which were refused a classification by the BBFC so they could not be viewed in cinemas or legal home video. These video nasties attracted attention because more people wanted to see why they were banned and they turned into a social event for people. Politically, the conservative government feared that people watching objectionable content in horror films and video nasties would inspire copycat behaviour from society to re-enact these films, which would raise the crime rate of the country. Technologically, the format wars between VHS and Betamax were ongoing. VHS won the format wars between the two video tape players because VHS was easier for people to pirate films and video nasties onto thus showing why film censorship had a role to play in the format wars.
In the early 1980's people were less interested in going to the cinema and instead it was more popular for people to stay at home and watch films on VHS or Betamax. This turned into a social event, with people inviting their friends over to watch films at their homes. The emergence of film censorship and regulated video content meant that some films were deemed too horrific, obscene or violent to be shown to the public by the BBFC, under the conservative government. Films that were refused a rating, which meant they could not be publicly released were placed on the 'video nasties' list with films like 'Driller Killer' and 'Cannibal Holocaust'. However criminals simply copied bootleg copies of the films from other countries and distributed them illegally to people wanting to watch them. This boosted the social aspect of staying at home and watching a film with friends because these films has gained notoriety and interest from being banned which is the exact opposite effect that the government wanted these films to have. This social context justifies that film censorship is highly motivated by fears about audiences and technologies because the new technological advancement of video tape players and recorders changed the way how people watch films entirely and film censorship is how they tried to stop this change.
These video nasties and other banned films were the end product of the countries moral panic caused by the conservative government led by Margaret Thatcher. The conservative government believed that content in films reflected on society and that very violent and obscene horror films could inspire similar or copycat behaviours in young people. To fight this, the National viewers and listeners association formed to protest against objectionable films, they protested and applied pressure on the BBFC to ban or censor films. The BBFC eventually did listen and they formed the video nasties list, where certain films were banned outright. This is a political context which justifies how film censorship is heavily motivated by fears about audiences, the conservative government felt that by allowing public access to these films content, it would incite violence into people and desensitise people. They also feared that the crime rate would go up in the country so they could have used the video nasties as a scapegoat for the increase in crime or violence.
Expanding on the moral panic surrounding these films, the government and the video tape industry suffered from the moral panic economically ,the National Viewers and Listeners Association protested against violent films and wanted the government, specifically the BBFC to regulate video content on home video. Eventually the BBFC regulated the content via age restrictions that they were already using in cinemas but now they were also using these certificates in home video releases. This restricted children or young teenagers from buying horror film tapes. This limited the sales of their tapes and people chose to buy pirate copies from criminals who didn't care how old you were. This combined with the accessibility of piracy on VHS meant that the video tape industry lost money. This links back to a economical context, because their fear is justified here because they lost money due to film censorship in that it reduced their buyers market.
Finally, the BBFC acted as a censor and regulator for the film and decided to ban films that formed the video nasties list. It also regulated what age group could watch a film via its classification system. Specifically, it was illegal to distribute or sell a video nasty in a shop. They could only be pirated in order to see them. Social demand was for people to watch these video nasties to see why they were banned. It was considered fashionable or popular to watch them and own them. This links to a technological and economic context with the format wars between VHS and Betamax which VHS won. VHS was easier for criminals to copy films, which meant people needed to watch pirate films and video nasties on VHS's. VHS was more popular. This links to film censorship and fears surrounding it because essentially, film censorship was made to fight piracy.
In conclusion, I think that film censorship was highly motivated by fears about audiences and technology. The conservative government and National Viewers and Listeners Association were worried about a moral panic in England whilst cinemas and film distributors found it hard to sell their regulated content tapes whilst piracy grew in popularity. Ultimately, the attempt to stop people being exposed to obscene content failed because by making a list of films that no one should watch, they inevitably attracted attention for people who wanted to see them. Ironically, the video nasties were probably more popular than they would have ever been if they were not on the video nasties list. Also, directors of video nasties like Wes Craven and Sam Raimi went to direct mainstream horror films so being on the video nasties list helped their career. For cinemas and film distributors, there is little they can do to stop piracy, with film classification being necessary in terms of content. There is always going to be piracy. However, censoring and banning content is ineffective in the long term as the video nasties have shown.
Sunday, 25 January 2015
Practice Question - Video Nasties
Film
censorship was created to protect
audiences from potentially inappropriate topics in film and to try and
minimise the influence of illegal
distribution of unregulated films as well as minimising the damage that
piracy was causing in the early 1980's. Although, this was not the only
reason why film censorship was created. Margaret Thatcher, Mary
Whitehouse and the rise of home video causing a decrease in income in
for cinema's were all factors which influenced film censorship.
Through
the increase of home video, people saw this as a new craze and it
became fashionable. These new technologies like VHS and Betamax meant
that people can now see films which may be considered inappropriate for
them. For example, young teenagers watching 18+ rated movies which
influenced film censorship to try and stop films like this being
accessible to audiences which would be inappropriate for them to watch. The
rise of both home video systems allowed much more efficient piracy for
audiences and unlimited access to unregulated films an example of this
would be Evil Dead which had intense gore which would be inappropriate
for viewers under the age of 18. This caused cinema's to lose money
since people were more likely to stay at home and rent a film than go
out and watch a film, especially lower budget films which would not have
been distributed to big cinemas. The
1980's led to many films considered as 'video nasties' being created
and censored by the BBFC. The aim of this was to supposedly protect the
people from possible psychological effects from the graphic gore in
these films an example of this would be I Spit on your Grave.
This seemed to stir up a 'moral panic' within the conservative party who were in power at the time who were led by Margaret Thatcher who used home video and 'video nasties' as scapegoats for the economic problems they were experiencing such as power cuts during the weeks, shortening work days for people in England as well as unemployment in general in England. Thatcher claimed that these video nasties were a threat to the people as they may possibly influence people to recreate certain aspects of them. These films also spread messages which contrasted with conservative views and the conservatives wanted to control what messages were being sent which was part of this moral panic. Mary Whitehouse also further reinforced these conservative views through media watch which was all about reinforcing family values, or what right wing sympathizers would consider as wholesome family values.
At first, video nasties were only banned in the cinema, but not for home video. The BBFC however did not enforced the Video Recordings Act (1984). This meant that all films which may be considered a video nasties must have been sent to the BBFC for evaluation. An interesting fact is that the BBFC were not very strict with video nasties until there was a conservative influence within the group who linked video nasties to problems within British society. They also feared these films would have a negative influence on the populations behavior. An interesting contrasting point however would be that there is no real recorded evidence or correlation to show that in the 1980's to even suggest that video nasties had an influence on crime rates and national issues in Britain during the 80's.
In conclusion, film censorship seems to have been influenced in some ways by the government through their beliefs that video nasties would have some affect on the general population. Home video was also a major issue, because without VHS or Betamax there would have been no way of getting around film censorship, so film censorship in the 80's was seriously influenced by technological advancements during that time. In comparison to the film industry today there seems to be a massive hole where video nasties used to be apart from a few which caused uproar such as The Human Centipede. Audiences have seemed to become desensitized to these kinds of films in modern society. Personally, I do not believe films should be censored but however still have regulations enforced on them as then it would be more down to personal choice rather that what the ruling government thinks you should see.
This seemed to stir up a 'moral panic' within the conservative party who were in power at the time who were led by Margaret Thatcher who used home video and 'video nasties' as scapegoats for the economic problems they were experiencing such as power cuts during the weeks, shortening work days for people in England as well as unemployment in general in England. Thatcher claimed that these video nasties were a threat to the people as they may possibly influence people to recreate certain aspects of them. These films also spread messages which contrasted with conservative views and the conservatives wanted to control what messages were being sent which was part of this moral panic. Mary Whitehouse also further reinforced these conservative views through media watch which was all about reinforcing family values, or what right wing sympathizers would consider as wholesome family values.
At first, video nasties were only banned in the cinema, but not for home video. The BBFC however did not enforced the Video Recordings Act (1984). This meant that all films which may be considered a video nasties must have been sent to the BBFC for evaluation. An interesting fact is that the BBFC were not very strict with video nasties until there was a conservative influence within the group who linked video nasties to problems within British society. They also feared these films would have a negative influence on the populations behavior. An interesting contrasting point however would be that there is no real recorded evidence or correlation to show that in the 1980's to even suggest that video nasties had an influence on crime rates and national issues in Britain during the 80's.
In conclusion, film censorship seems to have been influenced in some ways by the government through their beliefs that video nasties would have some affect on the general population. Home video was also a major issue, because without VHS or Betamax there would have been no way of getting around film censorship, so film censorship in the 80's was seriously influenced by technological advancements during that time. In comparison to the film industry today there seems to be a massive hole where video nasties used to be apart from a few which caused uproar such as The Human Centipede. Audiences have seemed to become desensitized to these kinds of films in modern society. Personally, I do not believe films should be censored but however still have regulations enforced on them as then it would be more down to personal choice rather that what the ruling government thinks you should see.
Practice Question: Multiplexes
"Why
did the 1980s see the
decline of Fleapit cinemas and emergence
of
the Multiplex? Give
reasons linking to the Production, Distribution & Exhibition of Blockbusters and their popularity."
Answer Scaffold:
Intro: Your answer to the question (production, distribution, exhibition)
3 x paragraphs: Point> Example (film)> Explain how this answer the question
Summary: Why Blockbusters are linked to rise in Multiplex cinema in 80's/personal opinion?
Task 2: Lesson Preparation
1. Read through and make notes on the articles and the videos linking to:
Technology
Economics
Social
2. Mind Map "Multiplexes in the UK"
surround the statement with your notes under the 3 contextual categories
3. Connect the answers to the questions -
you may have to research more extensively beyond the starting point
articles/video (& beyond wikipedia...)
- When was the first Multiplex in the UK?
- What was cinema attendance like in this time?
- What films were being played in the new Multiplexes (name and year?)
- How were these Multiplexes encouraging audiences to go to the cinema?
- Where are these Multiplexes built instead of the High Street and why?
- What had happened to audience leisure patterns that meant 'Fleapit' cinemas lost popularity?
- What advantages did Multiplexes offer cinema audiences and film distributors over Fleapits?
- What reasons was cinema attendance low? (Technologies and Audience Leisure Patterns)
Some answers (but not all) match up & explain (the bit where you THINK and deduce a connection)
- Youth Audience
- Multiplex guarantees a larger audience
- Audience Leisure Patterns: Fashion of Home Video (VHS/Betamax)
- Piracy & Home Video
- The Rise of Blockbuster 'Event' Movies
- Fleapit cinemas sound & picture quality experience and run down
- Recession & Cinema Attendance
- Audience Leisure Patterns: Shopping & Out of Town leisure
Practice Question: Multiplexes
What factors led to the decline of town or city centres cinemas in the late 1970s and early 1980s?Certain factors such as production, distribution and exhibition in the film industry have influenced the decline in town or city centre cinemas which have been influenced by different changes within society which led to an increase in multiplexes on the outskirts of city areas as well as the atmosphere in cinemas becoming more of a social experience rather than going to actually enjoy a film which led to the rise of multiplexes being placed in shopping centres. In terms of technology since visual effects from companies like Industrial, Light and Magic (ILM) were becoming more popular it led to people desiring a spectacle in which they could only get that experience from a multiplex and not in town or city centre cinemas'. Economically, merchandise and marketing made films in a multiplex more profitable since multiplexes were placed in shopping centres which influenced the decreasing popularity of town or city cinemas. In response to these factors blockbusters were being made to fill multiplexes to have more control over films being made and multiplexes were being created to house blockbusters because the film industry realised that this would make a profit because all audiences wanted were style over substance films.
As town or city centre cinema declined in came the rise of the blockbuster and multiplexes. In terms of production, companies were beginning to play more with special effects to create a spectacle and in return, these new effects created hype around films like Jaws turning it in to an event movie, creating the idea of going to a multiplex to be a social experience. An example of directors using new visual effects in their films to create a spectacle is when George Lucas and Steven Spielberg created ILM which was involved in the creation of Star Wars and also influenced the creation of ET in years to follow. As a result of this it has later influenced other film companies to conform to similar production techniques as they new they would get large audiences from films with spectacle over substance. Only multiplexes could house blockbusters because in terms of technology multiplex cinemas had wider screens, as well as better sound and video qualities which town or city centres did not have which led to a decrease in popularity for these 'flea pit' cinema's because they were using older screen technology and could not offer the same viewing experience that multiplexes could.
As the UK were just coming
out of a recession most families were still quite tight with money and
could not go out to enjoy films in the cinema which meant there was a
loss of business for town or city centre cinema's because they could
rent a film and get the same experience that they would in a town or
city centre cinema. Also piracy was also a huge issue, an example of
this is ET, ET was the most pirated film in 1982. Piracy
meant that American Hollywood Studios (AHS) were getting less revenue
from the blockbusters and they therefore needed something brand new to
give audiences or find another way to make their money back. They did
this through merchandising. Blockbusters began to only be played in
multiplexes and turned blockbusters in to event movies. This led to
marketing a film selling merchandise and advertisement to increase
revenue and attraction to the film before it is even released. An
example of a film which followed this formula of marketing is the Star
Wars franchise and the film was only given to Multiplexes as they
created a bigger experience than town or city centre cinema with better
seating and better sound quality. This hurt town and city centre
cinema's as all the films that were making huge amounts of money were
only being played in multiplexes which caused town and city centre
cinemas to decline.Technological
advancements like VHS and VCR meant that people did not need to leave
home to watch films, because of this it became fashionable to watch
films in your own home. This created an alternative to going to the
cinema that was not available before. It would not be before the rise of
the multiplex that people started going to see films again. Small town
and city centre cinemas lacked the social event status that VHS and VCR
provided. However, something to note is that because of the recession
most homes would not have a VHS or VCR because they would not be able to
afford one which suggests that this technological advancement may not
be the sole factor in the decline of town or city centre cinemas. A
contrasting point however is that for the homes that did have a VHS or
VCR it would be cheaper to rent a film, than to go out and watch a film
in a 'flea pit cinema'.
During the late 70s and early 80s teenagers quickly became the cinemas
main audience, they became this because they were economically dependent
on their parents, were granted a disposable income and were able to go
out socially whilst their parents worked for them. They were attracted
to multiplexes which were placed in shopping centers which were where
teenagers would interact socially before multiplexes were placed their
anyway. This in a sense devalued cinema because it turned it in to a
'shopping experience'. Blockbusters also in return became formulaic to
fit what teenagers liked. An example of this is Jaws, Jaws was a violent
film which attracted teenagers and it was also based in the summer time
in a beach setting which is relatable to things that teenagers like to
do socially. Jaws was also released during the Summer time during a time
where teenagers would go to the beach as well. This led to the decline
in town or city centers because teenage audiences had a big influence on
the film industry and multiplexes attracted them more than town or city
centers because multiplexes gave them more choice and gave them a new
experience in where they interact socially and town or city centers did
not deliver the same experience so teenagers did not go there to see
their films.In conclusion there seems to have been a substantial decline in town or city centre cinema in the late 1970's and early 80's which seems to have a correlation with the rise of the blockbuster and the rise of the multiplex. There also seems to be a correlation between the rise of home video and a decline in cinema attendance in town or city centre cinema. These have been influenced by social, economic and technological factors which offered new experiences for cinema audiences and you could only achieve the best experience apparently in multiplexes which pretty much put town or city centers out of business because blockbusters were only being played in multiplexes who were placed in the UK by AHS and multiplexes eventually became an experience for cinema goers, rather than actually going for the film itself, essentially devaluing films and blockbusters began to be created to be place in multiplexes and multiplexes created to house blockbusters.
Task 1
Starter:
HumanCentipedeTrailer
– who
has
seen
it?
Find
out what the story is and why it is controversial
Debate
Should
there
be
such
a
thing
as
censorship
of
films?
This should take 15 minutes
Task 2
New
Information: Exam Question 2 1970/80s
“Film
censorship
is
motivated
by
fears
about
audiences
and
technologies.”
Discuss
this
statement
in
reference
to
the
concerns
expressed
about
uncensored
and
unregulated
video
content
in
Britain
in
the
early
1980s.
[30]
Task:
Initial
Research: For the following words in BOLD - Know about what was happening, define the terms, outline
the context, and what relevance they have to the above exam question?
Group 1.
The right-wing, pro-censorship response
by
groups
such
as
the
National
Viewers
and
Listeners
Association
and
conservative
MPs
who wanted
the
introduction
of
restrictive
laws
for
access
to
films
on
video
Group 2.
2. The
level
of
take-up/fashion
amongst
the
UK
population
of
home
video
technologies
in
the
80s and
unregulated
home
video
distributors
Group 3.
3. The
dawning
of
the
home
video
age
-
format
wars
(VHS
and
Betamax)
and
the
moral
panic
about
the
uncensored
Video
Nasties
and
unregulated
video
content
and
move
to
regulation
of
film
in
the
home.
Some basic resources to work through to help - split then across your teams - not all looking:
http://youtu.be/OqbMvbP_j1k?t=6m17s watch
from 6m 17s – 11m 34 s
http://leighmediaasfilmessays12.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/1980s-video-nasties-bbfc-home-video.html
Check
Learning – Share your understanding across the team, this should take a about 30 mins to work through
Share your findings with the class as Mentor pairs Mind
Map
on A3 using highlighters your shared knowledge: write
the exam question in the middle
and use the notes to write analysis points under the contexts
Technology
Political
& Social
Economic
Each Mentor team should have a MIND MAP with the 3 contexts from the all the above
This should take about 20 mins - photograph & upload the Mind Map to your blog
Task 3
New
Information - Deeper analysis of the resources
Divide up the links between you as Mentor Partners
http://leighmediaasfilmessays12.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/1980s-video-nasties-bbfc-home-video.html
Create Meaning - look for answers in the videos & articles
- What is the significance of Home Video & the Format Wars for audiences
- What were the concerns around Home Video and regulation/censorship?
- What is a Video Nasty and why were they popular with audiences?
- What did these films have in common (Genre/Budget/Subject matter/Story)?
- Who were Margaret Thatcher & Mary Whitehouse and why were they relevant?
- How did Video Nasties become Political and how was this Moral Panic being exploited by the government?
In
your Mentor Teams work your way through the documentaries (seperately) &
questions - this should take 30 mins with 10 minutes to share across Teams of 4
Prepare
an argument: Critical
reviews of Banned Video Nasties
Each team of 4 take a different Case Study from the films below
For the following Video Nasties read
over the plot summary imdb or wikipedia – outline the content, watch the trailers - why do you think this one in particular banned?
How
have these Video Nasties been critically
received
over time, what films did these directors
go
on to make?
What
is your group's opinion - should these have been banned or censored?
What were the contextual reasons for these films being banned?
Apply to demonstrate
Do you agree with the right-wing (conservative) decisions to censor or restrict access (regulate) to these films? Justify your opinion with evidence from today and reference to one of the films.
Write your individual argument on your blog
Last Task should take 30 minutes
good Luck
Monday, 19 January 2015
Multiplex Cinemas - extract 3 Reasons
http://leighmediaasfilmessays12.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/fleapits-multiplexes-articles.html
1. Technological
2. Social
3. Economic
Students own research:
1. Put smaller cinemas out of business
2. Success of a few led to expansion in the 1980s
3. 1984 Multiplexes got people back into the cinema from big gradual decline low cinema attendance (Trend Home Video VCR)
4. Milton Keynes first multiplex in UK 1984/5
5. Rotate screens of the biggest films: release the biggest on the main screen then onto smaller for a longer run
Introduction
A combination of factors led to the decline in town and city centre cinemas but there are three main pointers: technological, economical and social reasons.
Exhibition
People were intrigued by the new all around better experience in the multiplex cinemas that they would pay slightly more money for, in comparison to the dilapidated flea pits. Due to the fact they were located in a shopping centre meant there were many more things to do within walking distance of the cinema- this meant people went on a 'day out', taking it for granted rather than saving up and treating it as a special occasion like the older generations usually do. this meant that the american film studios were making many films to keep the revenue and ratings flowing into the cinema.
1. Technological
2. Social
3. Economic
Students own research:
1. Put smaller cinemas out of business
2. Success of a few led to expansion in the 1980s
3. 1984 Multiplexes got people back into the cinema from big gradual decline low cinema attendance (Trend Home Video VCR)
4. Milton Keynes first multiplex in UK 1984/5
5. Rotate screens of the biggest films: release the biggest on the main screen then onto smaller for a longer run
What factors led to the decline of town or city centre cinemas in the late 1970's and early 1980's?
A combination of factors led to the decline in town and city centre cinemas but there are three main pointers: technological, economical and social reasons.
Teenagers have disposable income so have money to spend with friend
through a socialising environment such as cinemas and due to the
multiplex cinemas being built in shopping centres that are easily
accessible through the motorway and have more attractions such as
restaurants, arcades and shops mean that a day outing can be planned
around the entertainment available.
The development of
VFX that was first displayed in Star Wars led to the making of the
Industrial Light and Magic company founded by George Lucas and Steven
Spielberg.
Multiplex cinemas replace flea pits due to the beneficial income because
of the variety of films that will be advertised meaning a greater
audience is brought to increase their revenue.
Production
Spectacle films are now being produced due to VFX and the formulaic
value that they know will sell to the audience- Star Wars was produced
in 1975 which changed the course of cinema down this avenue leading to
more films such as E.T that conformed to the science fiction genre which
was now a huge hit with the teenage audience. However due to the mass
of the teenage audience that brought in majority of the ratings, it also
brought in new types of films such as the disco era that was brought
about making films such as Saturday night fever in 1977 which was to
reassure the fact they would continue bringing this audience in.
Distribution
Piracy
meant that American film studios were getting less revenue from the
blockbusters being churned out which means they cannot afford to take a
risk with a new creative idea for a film meaning the same formulaic
films year in year out are being produced. This meant that American film
studios had to cooperate with the new consuming preference of the
audiences through the internet which led to the creation of Netflix and
hulu so that people could watch movies online but still get money out of
the audiences.
People were intrigued by the new all around better experience in the multiplex cinemas that they would pay slightly more money for, in comparison to the dilapidated flea pits. Due to the fact they were located in a shopping centre meant there were many more things to do within walking distance of the cinema- this meant people went on a 'day out', taking it for granted rather than saving up and treating it as a special occasion like the older generations usually do. this meant that the american film studios were making many films to keep the revenue and ratings flowing into the cinema.
Sunday, 4 January 2015
3.2.1 Film Text & Context intro Blockbusters in Context
Starter: What characteristics of Blockbusters do these films demonstrate?
Conclusion:
What does this suggest about the popularity of Indie Franchise Films - is there a formula, which audiences?
Homework review: Unit F631: Film Text and Context Section B: Cinema...
1. The exam and its requirements – skim & present
ñ How many questions & what topics?
ñ What relevance are knowing about Blockbusters?
ñ What case studies are you writing about?
ñ What is Production?
ñ What is Distribution & Marketing?
ñ What is Exhibition/Exchange?
ñ What do we mean by context?
ñ BONUS Name the 2 most influential directors of these emerging types of films in 70's/80's?
starter: Match up the PDE
http://leighmediaasfilmessays12.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/film-production-distribution-exhibition.html
Answers to PDE: http://prissnashfilm.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/pde-qualities-and-values.html
Create Meaning
What are the arguments around Blockbusters? Case Study: Transformers
Apply: Your opinions – discussion on post it notes
Create Meaning
Identify significant points of Context that have had an effect on the rise and dominance of Blockbuster movies.
Use Popplet to create a Flow Diagram of the relevent points of context you have extracted from the articles
Use Popplet to create a Flow Diagram of the relevent points of context you have extracted from the articles
Student 1: Social (audience behaviours, preferences, cinema attendance)
Student 2: Technology (Projection, sound, visual effects, online)
Student 3: Economic (budgets, marketing, box office, recession, piracy)
Student 4: Conclusion – summarise how have all 3 contexts have affected the Production of these films?
Mid point plenary/Review
http://leighmediaasfilmessays12.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/the-deuction-journey-or-how-to-apply.html
Mid point plenary/Review
http://leighmediaasfilmessays12.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/the-deuction-journey-or-how-to-apply.html
Break
Session 2 Kermode on Transformers 4
Micro Essay
Reasons why the popularity of certain films in the 1970s led to the rise of the Blockbuster formula
1. Economic
2. Social
3. Technological
How is this the legacy of Lucas & Speilberg?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMOVFvcNfvE
American
Film Studios built multiplex cinemas on the outskirts of town in a
shopping centre in England to replace the single screen cinemas that
were also known as 'flee pits' that advertised their Hollywood films.
Due to the fact that there was more than one screen meant that there was
a variety of films available to watch that the audience could chose
from, however they were the same formulaic structure which meant that
all it was doing really was leading us to believe people had a
choice.Their Hollywood films were known as blockbusters which were new
movies with the added spectacle which brought new interest to the
screen. The fourth Star Wars Film: A New Hope directed by George Lucas
was a well known American production that was all spectacle; alternate
universe, explosions, lasers, light sabers and aliens which changed the
course of cinema from then onwards.
Homework Prereading Next week's lesson1. Economic
2. Social
3. Technological
How is this the legacy of Lucas & Speilberg?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMOVFvcNfvE
What social, economic & technological context gave rise to the blockbuster film from 1975-1983?
In
the time frame between 1975 and 1983 the teenage demographic was on an
increase due to the social events that became increasingly common and
the new rage of things to do was attend the new and improved multiplex
cinemas; due to the disposable income that teenagers were entitled to
from their parents meant they could go out and do what they wanted. Due
to the majority of viewers in cinemas being teenagers meant that they
were the huge influence on the ratings of films and the summer
blockbusters. From 1975, due to this, new eras of film were born such as
the disco era from which the blockbuster, 'Saturday Night Fever' was
produced in 1977; this film was directed at the new and common
teenage demographic that were the reason for majority of the multiplex
cinema's income.
The
new invention of VFX to be used in movies meant that it added to the
spectacle and gave something new and exciting to the cinemas which meant
it brought in the audience. In 1975 the blockbuster 'Jaws' was released
which was one of the most successful blockbusters of all time. VFX was
bascially what brought people out of their homes and into the cinema.
Cinema
viewings became less popular in the 1980's which meant there was the
invention of the VCR which meant people could watch movies at home; E.T
was the first movie to be released on VCR. Due to the VCR and video
tapes bringing movies to people's homes, it meant the fashionability of
people staying in at home to watch movies came in.
Multiplex
cinemas were built near motorways to make it easily accessible and
noticeable by people; due to the fact they were usually located on the
upper floor of shopping centres meant there were many other attractions
to draw the demographic in such as shops and restaurants. Milton Keys in
Birminghamshire was the first multiplex cinema to be built in England;
it was a business that the Americans used to earn money both ends;
brought money in to expand the cinema and bring new things in that would
be new and exciting.
Fleapits & Multiplexes articles/notes to read
&
http://leighmediaasfilmessays12.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/lesson-43-how-blockbusters-led-to-rise.html - prepare answers to these questions:
Create Meaning: How did the Blockbuster affect Production, Distribution & Exhibition?
Expert groups:
- Cinema Attendance 1972-1980 why was this? (Economic, Social reasons?)
- Production Technologies (Star Wars) & the Big Screen Experience
- Distribution - The Event Movie hype (marketing budgets)
- Box Office numbers of the early Blockbusters (exhibition)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)